Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sue Billington's avatar

Thank you for your report. I just hope this new Govt will take the points you and other reputable scientists have raised and consider the importance of public health. A healthy nation is a productive nation in every respect. I don’t ever want to hear a repeat of the views held by the previous Govt!

Expand full comment
Manuel Gomes's avatar

In Portugal, the curve of (confirmed) notifications of COVID new cases is also slowing down (decreasing slope). The value of Rt is still slightly above 1, but I expect that we might be passing the peak next week (variation 0%, Rt=1).

Assuming that the level of underreporting remained stable in the past 2 months, a few things can be said regarding the Portuguese KP* wave.

Cases started to increase in early May. The rate of variation hit the peak in middle May (approxim +13.5% a day) with an estimated Rt ~ 1.5, which means cases were doubling every 5 days.

By the end of May, Rt ~ 1.3 (doubling every 12 days), and by the end of Junhe, Rt~1.05.

What might have caused this? The Portuguese reference lab reports that throughout May, the KP.3 lineage became dominant in samples. Simultaneously, humoral population protection was probably already very low in April, as the last vaccine campaign took place more than 5 months ago (with a coverture of only 56% in 60+).

What amazes me is that this virus manages to have an Rt ~1.5 in the middle of a sunny springtime! when most other respiratory virus have already Rt <<1. SARS-Cov-2 has such an high transmissibility that it cares very little for weather seasonality. What appears to determine whether we will have another wave or not is the combination of the ability of new sublineages to evade antibodies with how long ago was the last vaccination campaign (or the last wave).

If humoral population protection is low, a big wave is only a matter of mutational chance and therefore almost unpredictable. Manuel Gomes, Portugal

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts